God’s will and Republicans

One of the ironies of this election season is that while President Obama and the Democrats hold a most extreme position on abortion (why doesn’t Romney ask about partial birth abortion?), the Republicans seem bent on proving that they are the ones who can’t be trusted on this issue.

The latest gaffe occurred last night in Indiana, when Senate candidate Richard Mourdock was asked whether abortion should be allowed in cases of rape and incest. Mourdock replied:  “I struggled with it myself for a long time, but I came to realize that life is that gift from God. And, I think, even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen.”

As you might guess, that last phrase is what made news this morning. My view is that Mourdock is either right or wrong, depending on what he meant by “God intended.” If he meant God’s sovereign, decretive will, then this is obviously true, for nothing could happen that is not intended by God in this sense. Even Arminians concede that God must have signed off on whatever comes to pass. But if Mourdock meant God’s moral will then he is tragically mistaken, for rape is about as evil as it gets in this life.

Mourdock clearly hit on this sovereign/moral distinction after the debate, but it was too late. He told the Indianapolis Star that it was “sick” and “bizarre” to interpret his comments to mean that God intended rape. He explained:  “What I said is God creates life. As I person of faith, I believe that. Does God want people raped? Of course not.”

Mourdock’s self-inflicted wound illustrates the importance of precision in theology. We can’t use such ambiguous phrases as “God intended” without immediately clarifying what we mean. If we give people the freedom to take it in the broad (sovereign decree) or restrictive sense (moral will), then we can be sure that our political opponents will interpret it in the way that best suits their aims. Worse, we might confuse and hurt many women who desperately need to hear a Word from God on this painfully important issue.

5 Comments

Add yours →

  1. Well said. I gulped when I saw the headline. We have far too many politicians who don’t understand basic economics and civics. Heaven help us if they start discussing theology without the discernment it requires.

  2. Before we can even address whether he was right or wrong, we have to ask the question: was it a LEGITIMATE RAPE? smh…

  3. I think precision is a great point, but I also think he could of simply kept his mouth shut and avoided it altogether especially when you only have a few minutes to engage the question.

  4. Jonathan Shelley October 25, 2012 — 2:09 pm

    Mike,
    Did you see the Gospel Coalition’s post on 10 questions a pro-choice candidate is never asked?

  5. Yes–Trevin did a great job with that. I saw Newt Gingrich nail Tom Friedman on this question on Meet the Press last month. Tom and everyone around the table were too blind to see their hypocrisy on this issue. I’m always surprised when someone so smart continuously misses the obvious.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: